Sark Green Life Space

1. Project at a glance

Project identity

Land and geographic identity

Development identity

Offering and status

2. The project story

• Sark Green Life Space is presented in the TG-RERA file as a residential plotted development at the stated project surveys, with HMDA’s final layout letter identifying the site at Mokila Village. The project’s land record also gives Kondapur as the village and identifies Masjid Banda as the locality; those are reproduced as filed rather than treated as a resolved cadastral location.
• The sanctioned layout is a residential open-plot layout, not an apartment or villa scheme. The drawing-derived record identifies plots numbered 1 through 109 and allocates land to plots, roads, parks/open space and social infrastructure. Individual building permissions are to be considered separately under the approval conditions. The supplied material does not establish that any particular plot has a permitted building, or provide a complete plot-size schedule.
• A Form 1A architect certificate states overall project completion and gives 08/08/2024 as the completion date. Separately, the TG-RERA amenity entries show selected infrastructure items at 75% progress. These are different types of evidence: the progress percentages are reported in the RERA amenity record, while Form 1A is an architect’s certification; neither is presented here as an independently inspected site assessment or as an authority-issued occupancy certificate.

3. Master plan, architecture & building design

• The final layout letter records a net layout extent of 57,948.93 Sqm. The drawing-derived area statement allocates 35,130.08 sq. m to plots, 15,586.89 sq. m to roads, 5,779.95 sq. m to parks/open space and 1,450.90 sq. m to social infrastructure; the drawing’s area statement also records amenity area as 0.00 sq. m. These figures describe the layout land-use split, not building floor area. The plot count and sizes were read from drawing text and should be checked against the approved drawing.
• The approved layout letter identifies a residential use and states that individual building permissions will be considered separately. It also requires roads to remain open for public access, prohibits compound walls, and specifies a minimum 3m (10’0”) safety distance from high-tension electricity lines. The supplied evidence does not state a building count, building footprint, number of floors, height for a particular building, or apartment-style internal design features.
• The approval documents reference roads and open spaces transferred to the local authority by registered gift deed 730/2022 dated 31.01.2022, and relinquishment deed 3871/2022 dated 22.07.2022 for mortgaged plots. The layout record identifies the mortgaged area as 5,810.24 sq. m, in plots 89 to 96 and 100 to 106; the approval documents describe this as a layout condition.

4. Homes, configurations & floor plans

This is a plotted layout, so apartment configuration, RERA saleable area, measured carpet area and loading are not applicable on the supplied evidence. The file identifies plot numbers 1–109, but does not include a complete plot-size schedule or booked/available inventory. Plot count and sizes are software-read from the layout drawing and require verification against the drawing.

The supplied drawing-processing record lists two layout sheets; the separate floor-plan record contains no measured floor-plan area and does not provide apartment plans.

5. Parking & vehicle circulation

• The evidence does not disclose a sanctioned parking-space count, visitor or accessible parking provision, parking allocation by plot, or parking arrangement for future individual buildings. No parking levels or ramp details are available for this plotted development.
• The layout drawing identifies roads, including a 12.00 mt. (40) road, and the approval requires roads to remain open for public access. A drawn or reserved layout area does not, by itself, establish an exclusive parking allocation for a buyer.

6. Amenities, recreation & open spaces

The final layout approval lists water supply, sewerage, drainage-disposal systems, street lighting, rainwater-harvesting structure and civic amenities. The RERA amenity record separately reports infrastructure progress; those percentages are promoter-reported, not independently verified completion.

No clubhouse, indoor recreation facility or sports facility is identified in the supplied project evidence. The layout record reports aggregate recreational open space at 0%, while the drawing-derived land-use statement records parks/open space; these are retained as separate supplied records, without inferring delivery status.

7. Utilities, building services & safety

• The final layout approval lists water supply, sewerage, drainage-disposal systems, street lighting, rainwater harvesting and civic amenities. It does not give capacities, operating status or independent commissioning evidence. The RERA amenity record reports 75% progress for water supply, sewerage, storm-water drains, street lighting, water conservation/rainwater harvesting and the electrical meter room/sub-station/receiving station.
• The supplied approval-intimation document sets out requirements concerning a potable-water connection, sewerage treatment or septage treatment, underground storm-water drainage, utility ducting, a transformer yard, LED street lighting, solid-waste segregation and disposal, and fire-service norms. These are stated as approval conditions/instructions; the supplied material does not establish their completed installation or statutory clearance.
• No documented system capacities are supplied for water storage or treatment, STP, electrical supply or backup, fire equipment, security, accessibility, or waste processing. No lift or building-service details are applicable to the evidence for this plotted layout.

8. Location, access & connectivity

• The project is identified as being in Masjid Banda, with the layout approval naming Mokila Village, Ranga Reddy District. The RERA identity and registration certificate also state Kondapur Village and Serilingampally Mandal. The registered PIN is 500084. The supplied records do not provide a resolved revenue-village identification beyond these recorded entries.
• The layout boundary description gives an existing nala to the east, land of others to the west and south, and a proposed 40 feet road to the north. The approval and drawing records refer to layout roads, including a 12.00 mt. (40) road. The only supplied connectivity distance is HITEC City — 5.6 km; no travel time or public-transport information is provided.

9. Developer & development status

• The registered legal promoter is Sark Projects India Private Limited, a company. The registration certificate gives the promoter office as Village: Maseed Banda, Mandal: Serilingampally, District: Ranga Reddy, PIN 500084. The supplied corporate record identifies directors Smitha Reddy Katta and Sarin Katta, with Sarin Katta also listed as an authorised signatory.
• The RERA record lists proposed completion as 23/08/2022; the registration certificate was valid to that date and the supplied record says it was not extended. The Form 1A architect certificate records completion dated 08/08/2024. These dates describe, respectively, the project’s declared completion timeline, registration validity and architect’s completion certification; they do not establish an authority-issued occupancy certificate.

10. Approvals, official records & documents